Skip to content
CogniYukti

Call intelligence · sales and interviews

A recording is not evidence. It is ninety minutes of homework.

Every tool in this category will record the call and hand you back a summary nobody reads. The thing that decides the deal was one sentence at minute thirty-one, and finding it means listening again.

So the call comes back as a list of quoted, timestamped facts — each one pressable, each one playing the moment it came from.

  • Every fact carries the sentence it came from
  • Coaching required to find real mistakes
  • Consent recorded before a byte is stored
One call, openedevery line has a timestamp
  • Objection“We've been burned on migrations before.”unresolved · rep's answer quoted too
  • Commitment“I'll get you the security questionnaire by Friday.”firm · theirs
  • Competitor“We're running the same evaluation with two others.”an active comparison
  • Pricing signal“Anything over fifty is a board conversation.”budget stated · USD 50,000
  • Pain point“Month end takes my team four days.”high
And four more: action items, topics with how long each was dwelt on, sentiment minute by minute, and coaching. The instruction is explicit — the quote must be a real substring, never invent one.
Illustrative

What this category usually is

Recording is solved. Reading is not.

Conversation intelligence is a crowded category and the basics are commodity: join the call, store the audio, produce a transcript, generate a summary. Several products do that competently and we are not going to pretend otherwise.

Where they stop is at the point of use. A summary is a paraphrase, and a paraphrase cannot be acted on — a rep will not accept "the prospect raised pricing concerns" as a reason to change their forecast, and they are right not to. What changes behaviour is the sentence, and the second it was said at, so the disagreement is with the customer rather than with the software.

  • Nothing here is a score on its own

    Every judgement opens into the quotes that produced it. A rep who disagrees can see which line they disagree with.

  • Three measurements involve no model at all

    Share of the talking, longest unbroken stretch, and how often the turn changed — computed arithmetically from the timings, so they are identical whether the words came from audio or from a transcript file.

  • It covers interviews as well as sales calls

    The same engine that returns a sales objection returns what a candidate actually claimed, and the follow-up nobody chased.

Getting a call in

Four doors, and one of them costs nothing to transcribe.

Upload the file. Drop in the transcript your meeting tool already wrote. Dial from inside the CRM. Or send the bot, which joins under its own name so nobody is recorded without seeing it happen.

The second door surprises people. If your meeting platform already produces a transcript, there is nothing left to transcribe — the evidence is extracted from a file you already have.

How a call gets in
  • Upload the recordingtranscribed
    consent confirmed before a byte is stored
  • Drop in the transcriptno transcription at all
    the file your meeting tool already produced
  • Dial from the CRMcaptured as it happens
    browser phone, or it rings your mobile and bridges
  • Send the botand knows who was speaking
    it joins named, in the participant list
The second row surprises people. If your meeting tool already writes a transcript, there is nothing left to transcribe — the evidence is extracted from a file you already have.
Illustrative

The whole module

Every capability, with a page that names the screen.

Written after reading how each one actually behaves — which is why each page tells you what it refuses to do as plainly as what it does.

See every capability in one list — all 7

Questions that decide it

Including the ones about consent.

Do we have to record everything?

No, and you should not. Everything the CRM does works without a single recording, and a deal with no calls is weighted neutrally in the forecast rather than marked down. Record where the evidence is worth having.

How is consent handled?

An upload is refused until it is confirmed, and who confirmed it is recorded with the time and the address. The meeting bot is visible in the participant list under its own name. On dialled calls, the announcement to the other party is yours to configure and deliver — the platform does not make it for you, and you should treat that as a requirement rather than an option.

What happens when somebody asks to be erased?

The recordings go, not just the contact record. The reasoning is written into the product: anonymising a contact leaves audio, a transcript and coaching quotes that still carry that person's voice and words.

Who can listen to a colleague's call?

Access follows the permission to read calls. Be deliberate about who holds it — the coaching notes on a call are a more sensitive artefact than the recording itself.

What languages does it handle?

Live transcription is configured for multilingual capture. The analysis and coaching are written in English today, so a call in another language will transcribe better than it coaches.

Does it cost per call?

Processing has a real vendor cost and the product meters it per call, per operation, so you can see what it is. Pricing is a quote rather than a published rate.

Book a demo

Bring a call you have already had.

The third one is the shortest demo on this site, and the most uncomfortable.

  • Upload it, or drop in the transcript your meeting tool already wrote
  • Open the objections and press one to hear the moment
  • Read what the coaching says the rep got wrong, with the quote
  • Ask a question across every call you have and see what it cites