Skip to content
CogniYukti

Open the role

Extraction you cannot check is extraction you have to redo.

Paste the description; thirteen canonical fields come back populated. Each one carries a confidence indicator and opens to the exact sentence it was taken from. The recruiter confirms or corrects before anything is saved — and that review step is the feature.

Two steps, in this order

Populate, then review. Never populate and hope.

Step one takes the title and the body of the description and mints a draft requisition and posting. Step two renders every extracted field for review — experience band, notice-period limit, budget, employment type, location, role family and the rest — with a confidence dot beside each and the source sentence one click away.

Fields the extractor was unsure about are marked, not hidden. A low confidence you can see is worth more than a high confidence you cannot check.

Illustrative
FieldExtractedConfidence
Experience8–12 yearsHigh
Max notice period60 daysHigh
Employment typeFull timeHigh
Budget (CTC)₹38,00,000Medium
Role familyData engineeringHigh
Work locationBengaluru · hybridMedium
Step two. Confidence on the left, the source sentence behind every value.
  • Your edits stick

    Corrections are captured, and the next extraction in your workspace reflects your phrasing, your clients' job titles and your market's conventions.

  • A draft, and it behaves like one

    Starting the wizard creates a draft requisition and its posting. Nothing is open, nothing is published, and nobody outside sees it — but it is a real draft, so if you abandon it halfway you will find it in your drafts rather than nowhere.

  • Same wizard for candidates

    Upload a resume and the identical review step runs on the candidate record.

Before you paste one in

Including what happens if you walk away.

How accurate is it?

Accurate enough to save the typing, not accurate enough to trust blind — which is why the review step is mandatory rather than optional. We would rather show you a medium-confidence field than quietly guess.

Does it write the job description for us?

Generative JD writing is table stakes and every competitor advertises it; we do not lead with it. What is different here is the reading — fields with their source attached, and corrections that persist.

What happens to our corrections?

They stay in your workspace and shape future extractions there. They are not pooled across customers.

What if we start the wizard and abandon it?

The draft requisition and its posting remain, as drafts. Nothing is open and nothing is visible outside, but they are yours to finish or delete — we would rather tell you that than have you find three half-made roles next month.

Book a demo

Paste a JD and watch the review step.

The thing worth looking at is not the speed. It is clicking a field and landing on the sentence it came from.